Shock finding: More than 75 percent of all ‘honey’ sold in grocery stores contains no honey at all, by definition Updated | TruthTheory

by Ethan A. Huff, staff writerNaturalNews

Just because those cute little bear-shaped bottles at the grocery store say “honey” on them does not necessarily mean that they actually contain honey.

A comprehensive investigation conducted by Food Safety News FSN has found that the vast majority of so-called honey products sold at grocery stores, big box stores, drug stores, and restaurants do not contain any pollen, which means they are not real honey.

For the investigation, Vaughn Bryant, one of the nation’s leading melissopalynologists, or experts in identifying pollen in honey, and director of the Palynology Research Laboratory at Texas A&M University, evaluated more than 60 products labeled as “honey” that had been purchased by FSN from ten states and the District of Columbia.

Bryant found that 76 percent of “honey” samples purchased from major grocery store chains like Kroger and Safeway, and 77 percent of samples purchased from big box chains like Sam’s Club and Wal-Mart, did not contain any pollen.

Even worse were “honey” samples taken from drug stores like Walgreens and CVS, and fast food restaurants like McDonald’s and KFC, 100 percent of which were found to contain not a trace of pollen.

The full FSN report with a list of all the pollen-less “honey” brands can be accessed here:http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2011/11/tests-show-most-store-honey-isn…

So what is all this phony honey made of? It is difficult to say for sure, as pollen is the key to verifying that honey is real. According to FSN, much of this imposter honey is more likely being secretly imported from China, and may even be contaminated with antibiotic drugs and other foreign materials.

read more about this shocking truth via Shock finding: More than 75 percent of all ‘honey’ sold in grocery stores contains no honey at all, by definition Updated | TruthTheory.

Advertisements

Big Hospital Finally telling the truth about Cancer, Johns Hopkins | Wausau News

LATEST CANCER INFORMATION

from Johns Hopkins

AFTER YEARS OF TELLING PEOPLE CHEMOTHERAPY IS THE ONLY WAY TO TRY AND ELIMINATE CANCER, JOHNS HOPKINS IS FINALLY STARTING TO TELL YOU THERE IS AN ALTERNATIVE WAY …

1. Every person has cancer cells in the body. These cancer cells do not show up in the standard tests until they have multiplied to a few billion. When doctors tell cancer patients that there are no more cancer cells in their bodies after treatment, it just means the tests are unable to detect the cancer cells because they have not reached the detectable size.

2. Cancer cells occur between 6 to more than 10 times in a person’s lifetime.

3. When the person’s immune system is strong the cancer cells will be destroyed and prevented from multiplying and forming tumors.

4. When a person has cancer it indicates the person has multiple nutritional deficiencies. These could be due to genetic, environmental, food and lifestyle factors.

5. To overcome the multiple nutritional deficiencies, changing diet and including supplements will strengthen the immune system.

6. Chemotherapy involves poisoning the rapidly-growing cancer cells and also destroys rapidly-growing healthy cells in the bone marrow, gastro-intestinal tract etc, and can cause organ damage, like liver, kidneys, heart, lungs etc.

7. Radiation while destroying cancer cells also burns, scars and damages healthy cells, tissues and organs.

8. Initial treatment with chemotherapy and radiation will often reduce tumor size. However prolonged use of chemotherapy and radiation do not result in more tumor destruction.

9. When the body has too much toxic burden from chemotherapy and radiation the immune system is either compromised or destroyed, hence the person can succumb to various kinds of infections and complications.

10. Chemotherapy and radiation can cause cancer cells to mutate and become resistant and difficult to destroy. Surgery can also cause cancer cells to spread to other sites.

11. An effective way to battle cancer is to STARVE the cancer cells by not feeding it with foods it needs to multiple.

What cancer cells feed on:

a. Sugar is a cancer-feeder. By cutting off sugar it cuts off one important food supply to the cancer cells.

Note:Sugar substitutes like NutraSweet, Equal, Spoonful, etc are made with Aspartame and it is harmful. A better natural substitute would be Manuka honey or molasses but only in very small amounts. Table salt has a chemical added to make it white in colour. Better alternative is Bragg’s aminos or sea salt.

read much more on this via Big Hospital Finally telling the truth about Cancer, Johns Hopkins | Wausau News.

The Shocking Story of How Aspartame Became Legal | The Mind Unleashed

Did you know that Aspartame was banned by the FDA twice? How is this product legal now?

The bittersweet argument over whether Aspartame is safe or not has been going on for a long time. On one side we have medical evidence that suggests we should avoid using it and on the other side we lean on the FDA’s approval that suggests it is safe. Since generally that seems to be the factor that many continue to hold trust based upon, I thought we could look into the Aspartame story to find out how it came to be accepted as safe by the FDA. You would think that something so widely used and so well accepted would have quite the pristine story leading to its acceptance. I imagine one will discover otherwise after reading this post.

It all starts in the mid 1960′s with a company called G.D. Searle. One of their chemists accidentally creates aspartame while trying to create a cure for stomach ulcers. Searle decides to put aspartame through a testing process which eventually leads to its approval by the FDA. Not long after, serious health effects begin to arise and G.D. Searle comes under fire for their testing practices. It is revealed that the testing process of Aspartame was among the worst the investigators had ever seen and that in fact the product was unsafe for use. Aspartame triggers the first criminal investigation of a manufacturer put into place by the FDA in 1977.

via The Shocking Story of How Aspartame Became Legal | The Mind Unleashed.

Over 60% of US drone targets in Pakistan are homes – research — RT News

The CIA has been bombing Pakistan’s domestic buildings more than any other targets over the past decade of the drone war launched by the US, says the latest research by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism.

Almost two thirds, or over 60 percent, of all US drone strikes in Pakistan targeted domestic buildings, says joint research conducted by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism (BIJ), a London-based non-profit news group, along with Forensic Architecture, a research unit based at Goldsmiths University, London, and Situ Research in New York.

The authors of the paper analyzed thousands of media reports, witness testimonies and field investigations to obtain the data on drone strikes in Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata).

According to the study, at least 132 houses have been destroyed in more than 380 strikes over the past decade with at least 222 civilians being among the 1,500 or more people killed.

“On average, 6.2 people and 0.9 reported civilians died per strike on domestic buildings,” says the paper, adding that these numbers may be conservative because the Bureau “has found the deaths of women are dramatically underreported.”

via Over 60% of US drone targets in Pakistan are homes – research — RT News.

BREAKING NEWS !!! Knokken tegen censuur

Knokken tegen censuur

De censuur is een voldongen feit. Er zitten nog twee mensen vast die gisteren deelnamen of aanwezig waren bij het verspreiden van verboden teksten. Op diverse video’s werden arrestaties en politiegeweld vastgelegd.

De censuur is een voldongen feit.

Niet alleen voor ondergetekende, de schrijfster van de tekst die werd verspreid, maar ook voor het uitdelen of zelfs alleen maar voorlezen of laten zien van een van de teksten door anderen. Op diverse video’s werden arrestaties en politiegeweld vastgelegd.

De censuur is een voldongen feit. Niet alleen voor ondergetekende, de schrijfster van de tekst die werd verspreid, maar ook voor het uitdelen of zelfs alleen maar voorlezen of laten zien van een van de teksten door anderen.

De actie van gisteren heeft precies blootgelegd wat blootgelegd moest worden: wij leven in een vermomde dictatuur en je kan niet alles zeggen wat je wilt, je mag niet oproepen tot verzet.

Toen Dennis Bos begon met het voorlezen van “Rara, wiens rechtsorde is het?” werd hij door de slaafse wetsdienaars gesommeerd daarmee op te houden, want anders…!

Een ander nam het over. Die werd ook gehinderd. Toen nam Dennis het weer over en liet de smeris het voorlezen voor wat het was. “U hoort hier nog wel van” werd Dennis toegevoegd. Wanneer dan? Ik heb zelf tijdens de actie met een kartonnen bord met daarop de tekst rondgelopen.

Op de Dam werd weliswaar tweemaal getracht het ding uit mijn handen te rukken, waarbij eenmaal mijn naam werd geroepen, maar dit mislukte. Van de Dam tot het Hof liep ik ermee, en tot mijn verbazing hield niemand mij tegen toen ik het mee de rechtszaal in nam en pontificaal voor mij neerlegde en op een moment ook toonde aan het hof. Lees het wetsartikel nog maar even na; dat is allemaal strafbaar. Ik daag justitie uit me daar dan ook voor te vervolgen. Waarom pakken jullie anderen daar wèl voor op?

Nadat het agressieve en repressieve politieoptreden de verzamelde groep uitdelers, sprekers, toeschouwers, supporters en plakkers met arrestaties uiteen had gedreven, werden onderweg naar het gerechtshof nog meer mensen opgepakt, en werden anderen voortdurend bedreigd met arrestatie. We hadden het al gezien op de Dam, waar ook iemand die aan het filmen was werd opgepakt. Persvrijheid? Ook gelijk maar afgeschaft.

lees de rest van het artikel via Knokken tegen censuur. AUB DELEN!! BREAKING NEWS 

Former CIA director: ‘We kill people based on metadata’ — RT USA

cia-director-metadata-kill-people.siAt a recent debate concerning the National Security Agency’s bulk surveillance programs, former CIA and NSA director Michael Hayden admitted that metadata is used as the basis for killing people.

The comments were made during a debate at Johns Hopkins University, after Georgetown University Law Center professor David Cole detailed the kind of information the government can obtain simply by collecting metadata – who you call, when you call them, how long the call lasts, and how often calls between the two parties are made.

read the entire post via Former CIA director: ‘We kill people based on metadata’ — RT USA.